Review:
Total Recall is all action
and visual spectacle with no substance or resonance. Ultimately, this new
version is not as good as the original,
and thus further begs the question of why it was necessary (remakes are fine, I
have problem with them, but if you want to tackle a genre classic, might as
well make it good, right?). The film is about Douglas Quaid, a factory worker
who dreams of something more in his life. Wanting to get away from the
day-to-day tedium, he decides to visit Rekall to take a virtual vacation by
having new memories implanted into his head. Something goes wrong and Quaid is
thrust into the middle of a conspiracy. Suddenly, he is told he is not Quaid
but actually a spy named Hauser, who betrayed his government going rogue on his
latest mission. Quaid’s world begins to fall apart as he questions his true
identity while fleeing from government agents. Director Len Wiseman does do a great job
with the aesthetics of the film, as everything has a great sci-fi future
utopian/dystopian (depending whether the characters are in the Colony or in the
UBF) visual look and feel. His action set-pieces are also mostly well done and
feature compelling moments of spectacle. However, Wiseman’s narrative seems to
be a very distant second to the visuals and action pieces. The whole story and
Quaid’s character arc are merely devices to propel the film forward from one
action sequence to the next. The characters are all broadly drawn stereotypes
with no personalities or interesting moments. It is as if Wiseman decided that
the characters did not matter at all. Quaid’s quest is seemingly to find out
who he really is, but the film never gives him any time or dramatic moments to
wrestle with this question. Rather, he is thrown into the action and just
accepts his role, shifting the focus from ‘who am I’ to stopping Cohaagen’s
evil plan, and thus the second act is just a series of action set-pieces
occupying space until the final confrontation. The problem is, though, the
audience does not care about Quaid, and why should they if the filmmakers do
not. In the first act, Wiseman tries to economically fit as much character into
Quaid’s scenes to suffice for the rest of the narrative – Quaid is unhappy with
the way his life has turned out: he has a crappy job, a crappy house, and no
real future (but his wife is good looking and supportive - so how bad for him
can we really feel?). But all that groundwork is sort of meaningless when Quaid
is not really Quaid but Hauser, and Quaid easily accepts that he is Hauser and
it is his mission or responsibility to get wrapped up in this life threatening
adventure to stop Cohaagen, who also happens to be the leader of the government.
Some hesitance should be expected right? Apparently Quaid wanted a new life so
much that likely dying seemed a better alternative. For the audience however, the
character just does not resonate, which makes all the action scenes work only
on a pure spectacle level, as there are no real stakes for the audience (and
the whole film is basically one action scene after the next). To make matters
worse, the main supporting characters are terrible as well. Melina, Quaid’s
contact in the terrorist organization (and love interest) has no personality at
all, she is just sort of there to tell Quaid what to do and get him from one
action sequence to the next. Cohaagen and Matthias (the leader of the
government and terrorist group respectively) have minimal involvement in the
story until late in the second act (and Matthias really has no point at all).
Only Lori, who is just a henchman (sort of combining Lori and Richter from Paul Verhoeven’s film), has some
good bad guy stuff (though, still nothing that great). Thus, Total Recall is a
film with no characters that matter on any level to the audience, and therefore
the narrative is meaningless leaving the crux of the whole viewing experience
on the action, which is only adequate with a few great and compelling moments
(like the initial fight between Lori and Quaid and the fight between Lori and
Melina). It is really the visual style and ambiance of the film that is its
saving grace. Without good characters to care about, the action, as good as it
is in places, still feeling long and even boring, and the visuals only go so
far. To say the least, the film is disappointing and forgettable (and
completely unneeded).
Technical,
aesthetic & acting achievements: Len Wiseman has made a career for
himself as an action director who makes entertaining films (but nothing great)
like Underworld and Live Free or Die Hard (both of
which I enjoyed). But with Total Recall, he has given in to the seemingly
predominant feeling in Hollywood action films right now – spectacle over
character and narrative. Sadly, it is character and narrative that make the
action work, otherwise it is just noisy and inconsequential – clumsy filmmaking
that is to no one’s benefit. Visually, as stated in the review section, the
film is quite compelling. Paul
Cameron’s cinematography and especially Patrick Tatopoulos’s production
design does a fabulous job of creating the world and style of the narrative. The
overall visual style pays homage while creating its own look. The Colony has a
great aesthetic to it – that of a futuristic overcrowded slum. Cameron uses
lens flare a bit too much but still effectively to create a sci-fi feel and
visual motif (I am not sure, but my guess is that it was added in
postproduction), a bit like what J.J
Abrams and his D.P. Daniel
Mindel did with Star Trek.
The crisp lighting mixed with the gritty backgrounds harkens back to the neon
style of Blade Runner
in the Colony and the clean detached style of the UBF to Minority Report (and many other
sci-fi films). Harry
Gregson-Williams provides a great score for the film. It punctuates the
emotions (and fills in for the missing emotions in many cases), while also
completely complementing the overall aesthetic. It is very good work (here is a suite). On
paper, the cast is made up of fantastic talent. However, the film gives its actors
very little character to work with, and almost no good dramatic moments.
Basically, all they do is spout exposition and run around in action set-pieces.
John Cho, Bokeem Woodbine and the
criminally underused Bill Nighy
are good in their small supporting roles. Bryan Cranston and Jessica Biel (both with horribly
underwritten characters) still add enough to their characters to make the
audience somewhat engaged. Kate
Beckinsale has probably the best role in the film. As the main henchman,
she gets to just be evil and go after Quaid relentlessly, and she does a good
job doing it. Colin Farrell
does his utmost to make the audience care about Quaid. But, the majority of the
film is spent on action and not character, and so he is unsuccessful (but it is
not his fault).
Summary
& score: Total Recall is a throwaway genre film, to be seen only by
fans of vapid and soulless action spectacle. 4/10
No comments:
Post a Comment