Showing posts with label Jane Goldman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jane Goldman. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 7, 2011

X-Men: First Class (2011) – Review

Review: X-Men: First Class is the X-Men movie we have all been waiting for – full of great action, wonderful performances and direction that both gets the characters and how to make a fantastic genre film. Writer-director Matthew Vaughn seems to get better with each film he makes. Here, he took on the daunting task of making a sequel/reboot (it is sort of both) to a franchise that was all but dead thanks to the last two films (X-Men: The Last Stand and X-Men Origins: Wolverine) being complete disappointments for fans (and the first two done by Bryan Singer, the main producer on this film, only being ok but nowhere near as good as the great comic book films like Spider-Man 2, Batman Begins and The Dark Knight). This is among the best comic book films (and probably the second best Marvel movie made to date, behind Spider-Man 2). Setting the film in the 60’s is a stroke of brilliance, as it opens the world of the X-Men up to cool stylistic changes and to a period ripe with social and cultural chaos and change (the Cold War specifically, but also civil rights). Vaughn definitely pulls from period influences as some of the early sequences involving Erik Lehnsherr feel like excerpts from a Sean Connery James Bond film and Sebastian Shaw (minus the powers) could easily slip right in as a perfect nemesis to Bond. Critics to the film will say that it is overstuffed and really serves no point (since we already know where the story is heading, given the other four films in the franchise), but this film feels very much like a reboot (and sure, it does nod to the other films, but it does not fit story wise or in the timeline precisely). The characters have all been reimagined in the brilliant performances this fantastic cast gives them. In terms of the film being overstuffed, there is a lot going on in the film – a lot of story, a lot of characters (and origins), as the film needed to serve as both the beginning of a new trilogy (should one happen, and I really hope it does) and a prequel to the other films (should no more X-Men films be made with these actors), making it a very difficult narrative for Vaughn and screenwriter Jane Goldman to form. They do the job almost perfectly. Each character has their dramatic moments, which allows the audience to connect to them, even with very limited screen time. A slight issue does arise during the third act, as the relationship between Lehnsherr and Charles Xavier beings to deteriorate. The actor’s chemistry is so good that the audience is far more interested in their story and their relationship, that the villain, Shaw, and his evil plan do not seem as important. Plus (at least for me) when the film ended, there is such an expectation for more that the ending is unwelcome (especially with potential sequels yet to be confirmed). Vaughn also infused great humor into the film (something that had been in the previous films, but had never quite worked and came off really cheesy and just sort of bad). The humor works great in breaking up the dramatic tension and action and letting the audience release (an important element in creating a narrative that has good pacing). Vaughn does not shy away from the politics and social realities of the period either, as there is a strong sense of women being second class citizens among men in the film (something Vaughn apparently had to fight Fox to keep in the film), which plays off the whole mutants being scared and mistrusted in ‘normal’ human society (a theme prevalent in all X-Men media). Some have also complained about Vaughn and the writers rewriting history by inserting the X-Men into the Cuban Missile Crisis, but that is a fairly poor argument, as taking the film at face value and accepting the world in which mutants exist means accepting that it is different from our own, with its own history. X-Men: First Class may not appeal to all viewers, as it is made for genre fans specifically, but those that appreciate comic book films (and I would argue good cinema in general) will really enjoy what this film has to offer (as I stated above: this is the X-Men film I have wanted to see since I first became a fan).


Technical and acting achievements: Writer-director Matthew Vaughn has developed such a talent for interweaving violence, humor, drama, and action that his narratives not only entertain but also fully engage their audiences. He also brings out such great work from his actors. I (for one) really would like to see Fox continue the trilogy with Vaughn and Goldman directing and scripting the future installments with this cast, as I think they can only get better (and that is saying something given how good this film is), and a credit to producer Bryan Singer as well for coming up with the basic story idea and placing the series in the 60’s (and for bringing on Vaughn to direct). Composer Henry Jackman’s (who also scored a portion of Vaughn’s Kick-Ass) score is very interesting playing off the time period and Bond influences, while also infusing a powerful electronic undertone. It sounds very different from most superhero movie scores, which is refreshing (here is an example). However, he is still able to capture the action and scope of the film well. John Mathieson’s cinematography is very good and he worked well with Vaughn’s stylistic shooting style. His work along with editor Lee Smith’s gives the film a very comic book panel feel, which is really cool and worked well in the transition of the narrative. Mathieson’s lighting also went very well with Chris Seagers’s amazing production design (I pretty much loved all the sets) giving the film a great and unique look in the genre. The international aspect of the film, with many locations, also showcased the brilliant work of Mathieson and Seagers. The cast is phenomenal, with many wonderful performances and great bit part casting. Kevin Bacon (whose performances I am not always a fan of) is very good as the film’s villain. He is a tad zany, but plays the role just like a Bond villain (which I said before), and it works great (Vaughn was able to get just the right performance from him, much like with Nicholas Cage in Kick-Ass). Jennifer Lawrence has a difficult role in the film, with her character’s transformation and acceptance of herself. She plays it very well, reminding us of the great actress we saw emerge in last year’s Winter’s Bone. Even with all the good supporting work, the film completely belonged to James McAvoy and Michael Fassbender. They were perfect in their portrayals of Xavier and Lehnsherr. Their relationship and chemistry is a big reason for the film working as well as it does.

Summary & score: With exciting action, funny wit, engaging drama, and beautiful aesthetics, X-Men: First Class has established itself as a premier comic book film (and piece of cinema in general). 9/10

Monday, April 19, 2010

Kick-Ass (2010) – Review

Kick-Ass is a remarkable blending of homage and parody, action and humor, drama and silliness. The film has it all. At its core, it is a coming-of-age story about a teenage boy finding his way in the world – only, to do so he decides to become a superhero despite having no powers or physical abilities. The film also has two sub-plot stories pertaining to differing relationships between parent and child. These three story structures are interwoven and intersect throughout the film, each with its own emotional journey – and Matthew Vaughn did an excellent job giving each narrative thread enough screen time and impact to resonate individually with the audience, thus each character matters, which benefits the overall experience – even despite all the laughs and silliness that the film offers, there is still a connection between the characters and audience. And the film does offer quite a few hilarious moments. These jokes are both at the expense of prior superhero films and books (the character of Kick-Ass has many visual, audio and narrative references to Spider-Man, while Big Daddy has many referring to Batman, even Adam West’s version) and the nature of what the characters are actually doing and reacting to on screen. The character of Mindy ‘Hit-Girl’ is outrageous – which sparks different reactions depending on the disposition of the viewer. She is an eleven-year-old girl whose father has brought her up in isolation, loving her completely, but raising her quite differently – to be a deadly assassin. We see the girl in action. And the film is unflinching in its depiction of violence, only some find it more shocking because the character is eleven. And she has a foul mouth, which again is seemingly only shocking and offensive because the character is eleven. However, taking the character as she is portrayed in the world of the film, she is wonderfully cute and spunky and brings that to her alter ego, which does produce a number of laughs. It is the situation as a whole for many of the characters that produces most of the best moments of humor, be them relatable (being awkward around a girl) or absurd (most of everything involving the relationship between Mindy and her father – their introduction in the film is one the funniest and best in recent memory). Director Vaughn seems to blend in his British gangster film style from a lot of his previous work into the film, especially in the scenes involving Frank D’Amico. The film walks an interesting line throughout, there is a feeling of light-hearted comedy that is constantly being impacted with action and drama, but where Vaughn excels is in his ability to master all three aspects and balance them to their best use, thereby engrossing the audience in the drama of the story, giving them the action they expect and making them laugh too throughout the whole film, really a masterful job done. He is also able to pay homage to superhero movies and comics. While many of the jokes do stem from the ridiculousness of superheroes in the real world, there is a definite sense that the filmmakers involved here truly love and care about comics and their byproducts, and there are many references and shout outs in the film (it is awesome that one of the characters is reading Runaways in one shot). On the technical side of the film, along with Vaughn’s superb directing, the film benefits from having a great cast and crew. The production design by Russell De Rozario in the film was pitch perfect (I especially liked his Atomic Comic set and Frank D’Amico’s apartment). It captured the world that each character inhabited perfectly, and helped tell their story visually. The score by the team of John Murphy, Henry Jackman, Ilan Eshkeri, and Marius De Vries and particularly the pop-music cues where able to capture the atmosphere of each character’s perceived  world, while also giving the audience insight into their emotional make up (using Banana Splits Tra La La Song for Hit-Girl’s first action sequence was sheer brilliance). The score also played off the talents of each composer involved, which helped Vaughn accentuate the style and mood for each scene (for example Jackman worked on The Dark Knight’s score, and you can hear the reference to that film in moments of the score here). The cinematography by Ben Davis fit each scene well. Davis was able to enhance the ambience of each sequence or scene with his work. He along with Vaughn also did quite a good job of staging many of the scenes as if the audience were looking at a panel in a comic through their shot selections. Stylistically, it was very fitting to the overall homage feeling to the piece. The dialogue was great, funny and worked throughout – the script by Vaughn and writing partner Jane Goldman, which was written at the same time as Mark Millar and John Romita Jr. were writing the graphic novel, is able to capture the humor in the situations that these characters find themselves in, but like the film as a whole it also takes stock in the characters and gives them real arches that audience can relate to and invest in. And finally, the cast was great. There are no weak performances in the piece. Clarke Duke, Even Peters, Lyndsy Fonseca, and Sophie Wu were all good in their supporting roles as Kick-Ass’s high school friends. Frank D’Amico’s henchmen, played by Michael Rispoli, Stu ‘Large’ Riley, Jason Flemyng, and Dexter Fletcher are also good in their supporting parts (Flemyng and Fletcher have appeared in all three of Vaughn’s directed films). The film, though, benefits greatly from the fantastic group of actors playing the main characters. Christopher Mintz-Plasse, still and maybe forever McLovin as far as the general movie-going population is concerned, is surprisingly good here – he has to do more range and play off the image that people associate with him, and he does so very well. Mark Strong is as always great; he was the ideal choice to play the villain. Nicolas Cage (who I normally would be unexcited about upon seeing his name in the credits) was hysterical. His approximation of Adam West’s Batman voice was fantastic. Chloe Grace Moretz stole the show (at least upon first viewing). Her mixture of cuteness and sarcasm amplifies her performance in a role that very easily could have not worked at all. She is just right in her approach and handling of the material. Lastly, Aaron Johnson did an excellent job too. He was able to guide the viewer through the world and his performance was completely relatable, which it needed to be for his character to work. Kick-Ass is a rare film – it is both absurdly violent and silly, and yet completely works, creating a humorous action-packed, yet meaningful, cinematic experience. 9/10