Showing posts with label Kirsten Dunst. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kirsten Dunst. Show all posts

Thursday, January 26, 2012

LeapBackBlog 2011 Film Awards – Part 4: Leading Performances

Film in 2011 saw many very good films. Deciding what made the lists and what did not was very difficult this year, and there are more than a few great films, performances and technical achievements that I had to leave off. The LeapBackBlog Film Awards are comprised of what I think were the best and most interesting films, the strongest performances (taking into consideration who the actor is and what else they have done, and 2011 again features a lot of amazing breakthrough performances), the narrative style that drew me in (best directing), and exquisite craftsmanship (best technical achievements). But really, these are lists of my favorites from the year.


Leading Performances:


The Descendants is built on its fantastic performances headlined by standout work from newcomer Shailene Woodley and George Clooney. He had a very good 2011 with this film and co-starring, co-writing and directing The Ides of March. In the last few years, Clooney has been making a name for himself as an acting heavyweight with performances in Syriana, Michael Clayton, Up in the Air, and The American. However with The Descendants, he does the best work of his career. There is still signs of his swagger that he brings to his work, but he is also very vulnerable and seems completely at a lose and out of his depth, which is perfect for his character Matt King a parent having to take sole responsibility for his two daughters for the first time while also being saddled with unwanted outside family pressures.


Viola Davis is a pillar of strength in The Help. It is easy to say the film is about perseverance and that her character Aibileen embodies all the qualities that come which the heroine of such a narrative, as that is true. But, The Help and Aibileen strive for more. Davis triumphs because of the depth and humanity she brings to the role. Yes, she is a strong woman as her character, but there is also a real fear as well. Without this fear, her story and actions would not resonate and mean as much as they do. The Help is one of the year’s best films because of the work of Davis and the other great actresses. Otherwise, it might have turned out to be another thinly veiled morally self-aggrandizing hollow film like Crash (one of the most overrated films of the last decade).


Winning the 2011 Cannes Film Festival Best Actress award for her performance in Melancholia, Kirsten Dunst does the best work of her career. Her character Justine has such an interesting arc – going from seemingly happy in the opening moments to being completely incapacitated by depression, only to find strength and purpose within herself when the world is about to end. She does not fear it, unlike all the other characters in the film. The range that the performance demands would be difficult for even great actresses, but Dunst seems to make it her own bringing such beauty and sadness to Justine. It is such a nuanced and subtle piece of work that I can only expect great thing from her in the future (as this is probably my favorite female performance of the year).


No one had a better 2011 than Michael Fassbender. He starred in four films (Jane Eyre, X-Men: First Class, A Dangerous Method, and Shame), giving brilliant performances in each (all of which could have probably made this list). However, it is with Shame that he does his most interesting work. As sex addict Brandon, Fassbender gives a haunting performance in which he seems to degrade himself into something subhuman. He completely gives himself over to the character (which must have been hard to deal with when the cameras were not rolling – the pain, anger and bleakness of it). Carey Mulligan gives another great supporting performance (in addition to Drive) and Fassbender plays off her very well. It is phenomenal work and one of the bravest performances of the 2011.


What is so incredible about Rooney Mara’s work in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is that her role was played ironically by Noomi Rapace in 2009 (2010 for U.S. audiences), and yet Mara brings so much to the role and is just as iconic (different, but equally as good, if not better). For those that have not seen her in Tanner Hall or the brilliant small supporting part she plays in The Social Network, her work here is the breakout performance of the year, as Mara is now a star and one of Hollywood’s most sought-after actresses. Mara plays Lisbeth Salander to be confident in troubling situations, but awkward and vulnerable when it comes to more personal relationships. She is mesmerizing, the audience misses her when she is not onscreen and anticipates her return (which can be said of the best performances).


In what is one of the most subtly and subdued performances of the year, Gary Oldman is absolutely phenomenal as George Smiley in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy. Smiley is such a difficult role to portray cinematically, as he is so boxed up emotionally. But, Oldman is able to give the audience just enough to make Smiley relatable allowing the audience to feel what he feels, while still being true to the character. He is one of the best character actors working today. I am not sure a lesser actor could have pulled this performance off. It is not flashy, but easily one of the most intricate and best performances of 2011. Oldman also has a very good small part in the Deathly Hallows: Part 2.


Elizabeth Olsen’s performance in Martha Marcy May Marlene is another of 2011’s many wonderful breakthroughs. Martha is also yet another difficult character to play, as so much of it needed to be shown subtlety so that her episodes dealing with constant fear and dread can come off feeling real (whether it actually is or not). The narrative structure of the film juxtaposes Martha on the compound with after she escapes and is staying with her sister (seemingly now a wreck). Olsen’s complete change in demeanor in each is remarkable. She also plays off fantastic character actor John Hawkes, who plays the cult leader, very well – and this being her first real dramatic performance.


Like good friend George Clooney, Brad Pitt has established himself as one of the best actors working right now (with recent performances in The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, among others). Pitt had a good 2011 as an actor as well with very good work in The Tree of Life and Moneyball. In Moneyball, Pitt plays maverick baseball GM Billy Beane – struggling to produce a good team without any money and also struggling with his own sense of self worth. Pitt plays it as if Beane is a loner, outside the system – a bit like a stoic cowboy out on the range. He has become a fabulous actor and I look forward to his future work.


With the role of Hanna in Hanna, I cannot imagine anyone else playing it (let alone as well) other than Saoirse Ronan. Physically, this is an extremely challenging role, as Ronan needed to both hit all the right dramatic notes in the coming-of-age story and all the action beats in the thriller aspect. She is completely believable as an action star, handling the fight sequences with grace and confidence. But, she is an even better dramatic actress. Hanna is a character completely virgin to the world, raised in solitude, and Ronan brings wonder be it guarded to the role. Building on her excellent breakthrough performance in Atonement, Ronan is one of the best young actresses right now.


Ever since Michael Shannon’s performance in Revolutionary Road, he has been an actor to watch. With his performance as Curtis in Take Shelter, Shannon captures the sheer panic of someone who feels like they are losing their mind. He does a lot of the dramatic work with his face and eyes, gradually letting the feelings of desperation, alarm and agitation take hold. This seems to be one of the forgotten performances of 2011, but it is certainly one of the best. Almost the whole narrative is predicated on Shannon’s work, and he is brilliant.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Melancholia (2011) – Review

Review: Melancholia is a visually astounding character drama – exploding with tension, fantastic performances and a beautiful and sort of tragic atmosphere. Director Lars von Trier tells us what we can expect right from the prologue (which reminded me a lot of Kanye West’s music video for Power, the way von Trier’s shots are essentially moving stills), basically showing us everything we are about to experience in a drawn out display of a series of elegant and striking images set to Richard Wagner’s Tristian and Isolde Prelude. It is a very powerful opening, but at the same time it is isolating for many moviegoers. It screams art film, though this is not a bad thing (and in fact, it is too bad that art film seems to have a negative meaning for the average moviegoers). The film in a lot of ways resembles Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life, just with more of a defined narrative structure, in that the characters are not burdened with laying out all their thoughts and feelings in words or clichés, rather the film allows the characters to be more subtle, relying instead on the juxtaposition of images to derive meaning , and the atmosphere and tone that von Trier creates plays into their performances and how we perceived them. As, thanks to the prologue, we know this is not going to end happily. This is not a Hollywood movie with grand missions and last ditch efforts to save the Earth. This is about these characters. What I really liked about it is that it is essential a disaster film, yet it is so personal and small in scale (narrative wise, that visually there are some grand shots). Here are these few characters isolated and completely helpless. von Trier also did well to juxtapose the sisters Justine and Claire. Their relationship goes through such an elaborate role reversal. But also, as independent characters, their journeys are quite intriguing and profound. The opening scene of the narrative, Justine and Michael in the limo as it tries to navigate a difficult turn, starts the characters on such a happy note – and this coming just after we see the Earth destroyed by a massive planet colliding with it in the prologue. So, right off the bat, we know this happiness is doomed. But von Trier, delays the impending annihilation rather focusing on digging into his characters and their relationships in part one. Which works, as the audience gets invested, making what is to come all the more difficult to accept and emotional. Part two seems like a totally different film in a way. Characters change in the face of the disaster, and it is very compelling to witness this change. As visually stunning as Melancholia is, it is the character work and performances that make it the engrossing piece that it is (but, wow are the visuals wonderful).


Technical, aesthetic & acting achievements: Lars von Trier is an exceptional and nonconventional filmmaker. Of his films using Hollywood actors, I think Melancholia is his best (and I like Dogville a lot too). It has a lot more going on than I think I was able to fully ascertain on the first viewing (random stuff like, it was mentioned a number of times that the estate featured an 18-hole golf course, but there is a shot of Justine walking across the green of a 19th hole, or why would Justine’s horse never cross the bridge, the same bridge that the golf cart dies on near the end). Plus, von Trier has this whole theme of good and evil playing under the main theme that comes to the surface in what Justine says about the Earth – all life being evil. It is definitely a film I want to see again. And that is a great compliment to both von Trier and the film. I did not think there was going to be better cinematography this year after seeing Emmanuel Lubezki’s in The Tree of Life, but Manuel Alberto Claro’s work on this film is as good and maybe even better. It completely blew me away. What makes it so brilliant is that it is completely grand and epic in scale and in its framing, and the color pallet is so clean and probably a bit saturated with mostly solid colors. Yet, it also captured the characters so specifically, there nuances. The eyes do most of the work in this film. Production designer Jette Lehmann also does exceptional work in creating the look of the film. I hope both these artists get more work from this film. The cast is very good; however there are only three roles of much substance. Charlotte Rampling, John Hurt, Alexander Skarsgard, and Stellan Skarsgard are all good in their limited parts. Kiefer Sutherland is quite good as a man who tries to be so strong and sort of a know-it-all, but underneath is actually very scared. Charlotte Gainsbourg is wonderful as Claire, the sister who has it all together but just does not know what to do in the face of her mortality, completely losing it. And, Kirsten Dunst is magnificent as Justine. She can convey so much with her eyes and mouth.

Summary & score: Melancholia is not going to appeal or work for everyone, it is far too specific in its style and narrative aspirations for that. I found it to be beautiful and very moving. 8/10

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Movie of the Week - Spider-Man 2

This week’s movie is Spider-Man 2 (2004).

The middle film in Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man Trilogy, the film is about Peter Parker’s confliction between being Spider-Man and helping people at the cost of his personal life and wanting a life of his own: school, being with Mary Jane and really just being normal. However, this internal struggle is compounded by a new villain in New York City, Doctor Octopus. The film is directed by Sam Raimi, who infuses it with his campy style and slapstick humor (but not overly done like Spider-Man 3, which Sony ruined). It is the best film of Raimi’s career, both narratively and stylistically. It is almost (if not) a perfect film from a narrative structure perspective. Every scene works together building a fantastic story. Alvin Sargent wrote the script, but Raimi and Pulitzer Prize for Literature winner Michael Chabon crafted the wonderful story. Raimi also has an amazingly good crew on the film with composer Danny Elfman, cinematographer Bill Pope, editor Bob Murawski, and production designer Neil Spisak. The cast is fabulous as well, the three stars (Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst and James Franco) all do their best work of the series and Alfred Molina gives one of the best super villain performances, full of pain and hate, but also passion and regret (one of the few super villains that the audience can relate to and connect with). The film set the bar for all future superhero films to come, as at the time (and in my opinion still is, but The Dark Knight is really good too) it was the best of its kind – a film to be taken seriously as a piece of cinema, while also being fun and the box office tent pole/flagship film that Sony wanted it to be. It made AFI’s 2007 shortlist for the top 100 American films of all-time. The film is thrilling, funny and dramatically resonant. It is really a masterwork by Raimi. That being said, it is a must see for genre fans and cinema fans alike. Check out the trailer.


Available on Blu-ray (Trilogy Blu-ray), DVD and to Rent