Showing posts with label Zoe Kazan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zoe Kazan. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

What If (2014) – Review

Review: What If is a generic romantic comedy, and yet it is highly enjoyable, sweet, and quite funny.

The film is about Wallace and Chantry. Wallace is a young med school dropout who is very cynical about love after his relationship failed with his latest girlfriend. Chantry is a young animator who is happily in a relationship with Ben (a successful U.N. negotiator); they have been together for five years. Wallace and Chantry meet at a mutual friend’s (Ben’s best friend Allan is also Chantry’s cousin) house party and immediately hit it off. Initially Wallace is uninterested in being friends with Chantry, despite their chemistry, because she has a boyfriend, but eventually decides that having her in his life, even as a friend only, is better than the alternative. The problem is, however, that regardless of intention, feelings are feelings and Wallace is in love with Chantry – them becoming close friends only making it more apparent and worse. So, the big question becomes: will Wallace risk it all and try to make something happen? Meanwhile, Chantry is happy with Ben, but there is an undeniable spark with Wallace. She feels something for him too, but she is with Ben. It is complicated for her too.

Let me start with what is all too obvious about What If. A common symptom of the genre is for romantic comedies to all adhere to the same formulaic structure. We as savvy consumers all already know how this story will play out, down to the precise plot points, before the opening credit even roll. Thusly, What If is at a disadvantage from the beginning. Of course it is going to be painfully generic – the genre and its consumers demand it, which then lead to the question of which genre classic will it most resemble. Without thinking about it too much, the first film that comes to mind is When Harry Met Sally… Not a bad film to want to emulate. So, the real success of What If hinges on whether or not it can make us fall in love with Wallace and Chantry, taking stock in their courtship and hoping that in the end they come together. To this, I would say that yes the film is successful.

Sure it is generic, but so are almost all modern romantic comedies. What If is one of the good ones. Romantic comedies now have sort of started to become films that try to differentiate themselves by having crazy premises or wacky characters or scenes of extreme situations. What If does not succumb to this annoying trend. It is a simple story about a boy and a girl who meet each other, like each other, but there is an obstacle that must be overcome before they can be together.

All that said, however, What If also has a very strange comedic undercurrent. Wallace and Chantry have wonderful chemistry because they find the same weird stuff interesting. When Wallace first meets Chantry, he makes a joke about collecting the pubic hair of all the women at the party. In almost every case that is a conversation killing statement, but Chantry is not taken aback by it and even thinks it is funny. At this moment, they should know as we the audience know that they are supposed to be together. They continue throughout the film to find the same odd stuff appealing and interesting, when really no one else ever would. All this gives the film a bizarre sense of humor that is also strangely refreshing. The film is not making the same boring jokes that every other genre film makes, and it is not inventing madcap situations for its characters to navigate for comedic purposes. In fact, the one potentially stand-out crazy situation that Wallace and Chantry find themselves in plays as a much more dramatic scene than it does for comedy. Again, the film rejects the stupidity of modern romantic comedies in favor of the classic in which characters we were supposed to care about got to know each other and fell in love with each other through conversation (as we fell in love with them).

Thus, What If comes down to its characters. Director Michael Dowse does a great job with them. Wallace and Chantry are given time to grow together and apart, and the audience does fall for them and does take stock in their potential relationship. Dowse, though, does stick to the formulaic structure on character as well. Wallace’s best friend Alan and his girlfriend Nicole are the typical loud, energetic comedic relief, while Chantry’s best friend (who is also her sister) Dalia plays the equally typical supportive friend role. And of course there is a scene in which Chantry has to push Dalia at Wallace because she already has a boyfriend and Wallace is single and not doing so would raise awkward suspicions even though secretly she is uncomfortable with the idea of them being together because subconsciously she likes Wallace (whether she fully knows it or not). Like I said, this is formulaic. With Ben, Dowse could have on one of two ways, the boring way would have seen Ben as a bad boyfriend to Chantry, making Wallace seem all the more a better choice, but Ben is a good boyfriend to Chantry. He is loving and has a good job. But, of course, there is a slight complication. Ben must move away for his job leaving his relationship with Chantry to exist as a long-distance relationship – which allows her to spend more time with Wallace. Here again, Dowse could have taken the easy road and Ben could have changed and moved on from Chantry, cheating on her and so on. But, he remains faithful and loving, though his ambitions for himself do somewhat deviate with what Chantry wants for herself. Although, if she really does love him and want him, they could make it work. Ben is not really the obstacle to Wallace and Chantry being together.

Dowse never gives Wallace an easy in with Chantry. This is what works about What If. Often in life, things are not easy. Yes, there is still a fairytale aspect to the film – it is a romantic comedy after all – but life gets in the way, just like it does with us. Because it is difficult, their inevitable union feels more satisfying and earned (something that is almost never true anymore in the genre). What If is good because it cares about its characters; it loves them, and in turn we love them too. And on a side note, it is hard not to love a film that visually references both The Princess Bride and The Thing.

What If is a good romantic comedy that features a cast of likable (be them off-beat) characters. It is refreshing in that it feels more like a classic entry in the genre than the boring and usually terrible nonsense we have come to expect today from the genre that we all still love because of those great old films and the few good ones that trickle through now.


Technical, aesthetic & acting achievements: Michael Dowse’s more mainstream directing career got off to a thud with the fairly terrible throwaway comedy Take Me Home Tonight (a film expected to succeed off the charm of the 1980s alone without a serviceable script of any kind, squandering its talented cast), after he made the successful small films Fubar and It’s All Gone Peter Tong. Dowse then returned to Canada’s film industry and has made two great comedies. The sports comedy Goon is one of 2012’s hidden gems and this year’s What If is among the best romantic comedies of the year so far. The success of Goon and What If stem from Dowse’s ability to garner good work from his actors, while also honing in on what is working comically.

What If features a soundtrack full of reasonably good contemporary music, but it mostly just fades into the background. Composer A.C. Newman’s score fills in the gaps and supports the tone and dramatic moments well. Rogier Stoffers’s cinematography works quite well. The film is visually and stylistically very straightforward; however, Stoffers takes advantage of the film’s locations (Toronto and Dublin) to bring a certain visual beauty in support of the budding relationship between Wallace and Chantry. Ethan Tobman’s production design is also fairly straightforward. All the sets are grounded in reality, though the art department does provide some interesting animations in support of the whimsical/odd undercurrent to the narrative (because romantic comedies are fairytales).

The cast is very likable and are all very good in the film. Oona Chaplin, Jemima Rooper, and Rafe Spall are good in small supporting roles. Mackenzie Davis has a fantastically fun energy as Nicole. Her personality is both infectious and a bit overwhelming. She makes a perfect foil for Alan, and yet still has enough to feel like a full character herself. Adam Driver, as he is in everything I have seen him in, is great as Alan. He just cannot help but draw focus. His energy is so dynamic. He is funny and intense. Megan Park gives a potentially breakthrough performance as Dalia. She is funny and a little goofy, but never feels anything less than a fully formed character (even in a formulaic genre role). Zoe Kazan is having a strong year making good indie romances (she is also great in this year’s In Your Eyes). Here, playing Chantry, she easily could have been the typical whimsy waif set upon the Earth to rescue Wallace from his cynicism, but she is having none of that. Chantry is a strong woman who has her own ambitions and desires. If this were a character drama, it would have been just as satisfying to see her go off alone facing her new life, confident that she would strive. Kazan is hard not to fall in love with in the film, especially when we are rooting for Chantry and Wallace to end up together. I hope she can continue to find good roles in good movies. Daniel Radcliffe is very good as Wallace. To some extent, when the film begins, he is playing kind of a loser. But, his charm and wit work ever in his favor – and there is no denying the great chemistry he has with Kazan (which is really the lifeblood of the film – as it would be with any film dependent on its leads). As is true with all of these actors, Radcliffe finds what works about his character and succeeds at creating a full person around it. He is likable, but unafraid to be a bit weird too.


Summary & score: What If exemplifies what good romantic comedies are: it is funny, it is cute, it has real drama, we love the characters, and while it may be generic it does not matter because it gets everything else right. 7/10

Friday, May 2, 2014

In Your Eyes (2014) – Review

Review: In Your Eyes is a powerful romantic drama that plays in the supernatural/sci-fi genre (well, it sort of does). The film is about Rebecca Porter and Dylan Kershaw; although they are separated by thousands of miles and have never met, they share a strange connection. They are able to feel each other’s emotions, see what the other sees, and even speak to one and other – each inside the other’s head. They are different in many ways, but they are both alone in the world and for the first time find something real and meaningful in each other. A romance of sorts develops, but Rebecca is married and Dylan is on parole trying to sort out his life across the country. A real relationship between the two seems impossible, even though a deep connection is forming.

There are a few things that really should hold In Your Eyes back. Chiefly, it looks and feels like a TV-movie (and not the quality, HBO produced kind). The film was produced on a micro-budget and released completely independently online (which is the future of indie film, I think). The look is enough to maybe scare off a few potential views, as it does look and feel a bit cheap (although, that said, it is fairly well-done considering it was made for essentially no money). Secondly, the supporting characters do not bring much to the film, existing merely as foils and plot point-driving narrative pieces. Character-wise, they are all underwritten and emotionally unimportant.

Yet, the main characters, Rebecca and Dylan, are very well written, acted, and developed. Their stories and shared story pulls the audience in, completely overcoming the deficiencies disgusted above (I forgot that the film looked and felt like a cheap TV-movie and that the supporting characters were weak; I was wholly drawn in and engaged by the main characters – like any great romance should).

Director Brin Hill and writer Joss Whedon handle the romance, drama, and comedy between Rebecca and Dylan beautifully. While the narrative does not shy always from genre troupes and clichés (I almost wonder if the title In Your Eyes is a reference to Say Anything… and Peter Gabriel’s iconic song that plays a pivotal role in that film), Hill and Whedon still present something that ultimately feels fresh and vital (again while seemingly embracing genre clichés – Dylan and Rebecca are in many ways just another reimagining of Romeo and Juliet). It is very funny when it needs to be, yet stunningly dramatic and tension filled when the narrative swells. Rebecca and Dylan’s love is that of storybooks, needing to overcome great obstacles. Hill and Whedon are able to elevate In Your Eyes above the constraints of its low budget with Whedon’s great dialog, story structure, and scenes and Hill’s sound directing.  The leading performances are just right too.

In Your Eyes has sort of a fantasy/sci-fi premise, yet it does not define the film or the characters. It is just the manner by which they meet. The filmmakers are also very smart to not try and explain it at all. It is simply just a strange phenomenon connecting these two people. And thus, the film works simply as a strong romantic drama, built (like all good romance narratives) around two people the audience wants to see fall in love with each other who begin to fall in love with each other, but this is Whedon, so a happy ending is not necessarily guaranteed (creating some of the great tension in the film; even though I could guess the plot and ending with ease, I still somewhat discounted myself because there is enough underlying tension that it seems possible that things will just all fall apart).


Technical, aesthetic & acting achievements: Director Brin Hill has made a few other low budget projects (and I am not too familiar with his work), but In Your Eyes is certainly a piece to be proud of for him. Joss Whedon provides a solid script for Hill to build off. It is easy to complain about a lot in the film, but really Whedon does such a wonderful job with his main characters and their story that nothing else really matters. Their narrative simply grabs you and holds you right until the end. You really care about Rebecca and Dylan (something that is becoming rare in most modern romantic films).

The film has a super small budget, and that is clear from the visuals, sound design, and all other production aspects of the film. Composer Tony Morales, however, provides a good score with some catchy songs. Elisha Christian’s cinematography also does a good job showcasing the different worlds Rebecca and Dylan live in. Rebecca’s upper class life in New Hampshire is very bleak and cold (shot with a blue tint), while Dylan’s is quite the opposite visually (his small New Mexico town shot in a warm orange tint), and yet they are both seemingly alone and trapped. Production designers Cindy Chao and Michele Yu (who also designed Whedon’s other micro-budget film Much Ado About Nothing) help create this stark contrast as well.

The cast overall is good, but the two leads are fantastic. Steve Harris, Mark Feuerstein, and Nikki Reed are good with what they are given in support. Michael Stahl-David is very good as Dylan. He creates a character that is charming and sympathetic, but also one who cannot seem to get out of his own way. He desperately wants to be a good man, but his past and his circumstances seem to too easily define him. Stahl-David brings so much energy to the role that it is hard not to immediately like him. Zoe Kazan is wonderful as Rebecca. She has the difficult job of playing a character that is stifled in almost every way, leading to her being in seemingly a constant state of self-doubt (so much so that she has trouble coping, having previously spent time in a psychiatric center). She appears fragile, but Kazan gives her a great inner strength and wonder that is just ready to burst out if only she were supported and loved and not merely sheltered and confined (like a caged bird). Kazan is already a bit of an indie darling, but with the right roles she could breakout; she has the talent. She and Stahl-David have profound chemistry, even though they only physically share one moment. Their performances make the film.


Summary & score: In Your Eyes has many obstacles to overcome (most stemming from its tiny budget) and it is maybe a bit overly sentimental/clichéd (but so are most, if not all, other romantic dramas), but it succeeds wonderfully thanks to beautiful and charming leading performances and a script that loves its two main characters and its genre, the romantic drama. 7/10


Watch the film here.

Monday, November 25, 2013

Movie of the Week – Revolutionary Road

This week’s movie: Revolutionary Road (2008).

Frank and April Wheeler have the life they thought they always wanted – a beautiful family, a nice suburban home, and a good job in the city. But each feels lost, the abyss of mundane life has swallowed them up. They desperately need a change. This story takes place in 1950s Connecticut.

Director Sam Mendes made what is probably his best film to date with Revolutionary Road. It is a scouring look at the myth of the 1950s’ ideal American family. Mendes is one of the great directors working today to come out of theatre – his other notably films include: American Beauty, Road to Perdition, and Skyfall. Mendes worked with a brilliant group of technicians on the film. Thomas Newman provides a strong score, while Roger Deakins delivers his patented wonderful photography (both are frequent collaborators of Mendes). Kristi Zea’s production designer is good as well.

The film stars Kate Winslet (who was Mendes’s wife at the time) and Leonardo DiCaprio each giving one of their career best performances. The film marks their on-screen reunion following Titanic. David Harbour, Kathy Bates, Kathryn Hahn, Zoe Kazan, Dylan Baker, and Michael Shannon (who is also electric) feature in support. Revolutionary Road is quietly one of the best acted films of the last decade, and yet only saw one Oscar nomination for acting (for Shannon, who lost to Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight, who gave maybe the best performance of the decade; meanwhile Winslet was nominated and won that year for The Reader, but I would argue that she is even better in this).

Revolutionary Road is emotionally draining and deeply affecting, but it is also a must-see for fans of brilliantly directed and acted dramas.


Trailer: Here
Available on: Blu-ray and Video On-Demand

Wednesday, May 9, 2012

Stars to Watch: Part 8 – Movies Spotlight – May 2012


Cinema constantly has new talent each and every year, making great films and opening audiences’ eyes to new characters, stories and worlds. 2012’s summer offers new films from these four budding new talented actresses.


What She’s Been In:

Alice Eve, 30, got her start while at Oxford, appearing in student stage productions. In 2004, she got her first roles on BBC television with Hawking and The Rotter’s Club, as well as a small part in Stage Beauty. Her first break came when she booked a principal supporting role opposite James McAvoy and Rebecca Hall in 2006’s Starter for 10. She has since taken roles in the comedy crime thriller Big Nothing with Simon Pegg, the failed Crash wannabe Crossing Over, Sex and the City 2, the British rom-com The Decoy Bride, the poorly received horror film ATM, and as a reoccurring character (and love interest of Vincent Chase) in the final season of Entourage.

Breakthrough:

Eve’s breakthrough in her home country of England may have been Starter for 10, but in the States it came in the 2010 rom-com She’s Out of My League, playing opposite Jay Baruchel. The film is about a normal guy (Baruchel) with a normal job (TSA agent) who meets the ‘perfect’ woman (a 10). But his insecurity begins to chip away at their relationship, because he doubts that she really likes him (because, in his mind how could she). Eve plays Molly, the girl who is seemingly way out of the normal guy’s league. The film is funny, and Eve is good in it. In April of this year she also starred opposite John Cusack and Luke Evans in The Raven (her second big American film). It is about Edgar Allen Poe and a young Baltimore detective who team up to stop a madman who begins killing people in the manner described in Poe’s stories. Eve plays the love interest/damsel in distress (while not a weighty dramatic or comedy part, it will get her more exposure).


Summer Film(s):

In May, Eve has a principal supporting role in Barry Sonnenfeld’s Men in Black III, which sees the return of Will Smith (both to the series and to films) and Tommy Lee Jones. Along with Eve, Josh Brolin is new to the cast. The film is about the sudden disappearance from existence of Agent K. Now, Agent J must time travel back to the 1960s to stop Agent K’s assassination. Eve plays young Agent O, who is the head of the MIBs in the present. She is also playing a younger version of Emma Thompson. MI3 is certainly the biggest film of Eve’s career to date, and its success will play a role in her success, but she has already booked an even bigger project set from 2013 which will likely make her more of a household name. Trailer: Here.

Upcoming:

In addition to The Raven and MI3, Eve has a third film slated for 2012. She stars with Samantha Morton, Aaron Paul and Helen Hunt in the drama Decoding Annie Parker. It is about the mostly true story of Annie Parker and the almost discovery of a cure for cancer. In 2013, she stars in J.J. Abrams’s Star Trek Sequel. The whole principal cast is back, with Benedict Cumberbatch and Eve new to the cast. Her role in the narrative and character are still secret, but it will be a film that should see her in many more films to come.


Career Highlights:

1)      Starter for 10 (2006) – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD)
2)      She’s Out of My League (2010) – lead (Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming)
3)      Entourage (2011) – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD)
*Editor’s picks


What She’s Been In:

Zoe Kazan, 28, got her start growing in up in the business. Both her parents are screenwriters and her grandfather is famed auteur director Elia Kazan. Her first role, while still in college at Yale, was in 2003’s Swordswallowers and Thin Men. From there, she took small roles in a number of films – notably The Savages, Fracture, In the Valley of Elah, Me and Orson Welles, Revolutionary Road(which was her first weighty dramatic film role, though still small),  The Private Lives of Pippa Lee, and It’s Complicated. She also began acting in stage plays. She made her Broadway debut in William Inge’s Come Back, Little Sheba. Next she took a role in another Broadway show – Anton Chekhov’s The Seagull. Being a playwright as well, her first play Absalom was performed at the 2009 Humana Festival of New American Plays. She got her first lead parts in the 2009 indie movies I Hate Valentine’s Day and The Exploding Girl. In 2010, she got a role as a reoccurring character on the HBO show Bored to Death (season two).

Breakthrough:

Kazan is known much more as an indie actress than for her work in Hollywood. A resident of Brooklyn, she mostly appears in plays and smaller films. Her breakthrough films in the indie world came with bigger parts in Happythankyoumoreplease and Meek’s Cutoff, both of which saw limited distribution in 2011. Happythankyoumoreplease is Josh Radnor’s dramedy romance following young people in relationships in New York City. Kazan plays one of these people, and the sister to Radnor’s lead. The film is sweet, funny and also a little sappy. Meek’s Cutoff, on the other hand, is a bleak western from Kelly Reichardt, starring Michelle Williams (and frequent Kazan collaborator Paul Dano). It is about settlers in 1845 on the Oregon Trail, having to deal with the bitter hardships of the journey. Kazan plays one of the settlers, in what is probably her most dramatically taxing performance to date.


Summer Film(s):

In July, Kazan co-stars with Paul Dano in the fantasy rom-com Ruby Sparks (which she also wrote – her first produced screenplay). It is about a struggling novelist with writer’s block. One day, to help himself begin his new book, he creates a new character Ruby Sparks (played by Kazan). Magically, she somehow comes into existence and he finds that he can control her by writing her character in his book (and yes, in different hands this could be very dark and depraved). Thus, he tries to write a girl he thinks will love him. The film is the second by Jonathan Dayton and Valerie Faris (the directors of Little Miss Sunshine). It looks light and fanciful, and serves as good counterprogramming to the blockbusters of summer, and hopefully sees Kazan getting bigger roles in the future. Trailer: Here.

Upcoming:

Kazan has a few movies upcoming. First, she stars with Nikki Reed and Steve Howey in the Joss Whedon scripted sci-fi romance In Your Eyes, directed by Brin Hill. Then, she has a supporting role in the Neil LaBute drama Some Girl(s), directed by Jennifer Getzinger (who has directed seven episodes of Mad Men among other TV) and starring Kristen Bell, Jennifer Morrison and Emily Watson. Finally, she stars opposite Jake Johnson in writer-director Jenee LaMarque’s debut The Pretty One, about a twin sister who assumes her sister’s identity after she dies.


Career Highlights:

1)      Revolutionary Road (2008)* – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming)
2)      Happythankyoumorepleae (2010) – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming)
3)      Meek’s Cutoff (2010) – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming)
4)      Bored to Death (2010) – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming)
*Editor’s picks


What She’s Been In:

Anna Kendrick, 26, got her start at a young age. Her parents would let her brother and her take the bus down from Maine to New York City to take auditions. Her first acting role came on Broadway in High Society in 1998 (she played Dinah), a performance that would earn her a Tony Award nomination (she is the third youngest actor to be nominated). She appeared in a number of other stage productions before making her film debut in 2003’s Camp (for which she earned an Independent Spirit Award for Best Debut Performance). She next took a supporting role in the indie dramedy Rocket Science. Her work in Rocket Science and Camp lead to her auditioning for and winning a small supporting role in Twilight (playing one of Bella’s high school friends). While her role is relatively small, set against the scale of the series, Kendrick did get her name a face out there to a much broader audience. She reprised her role in three of the sequels.

Breakthrough:

Kendrick’s breakthrough came with 2009’s Up in the Air. She was writer-director Jason Reitman’s first choice to play the role of Natalie Keener (a role that garnered her an Oscar nomination). She is brilliant in the film, holding her own in many scenes against George Clooney. But, I contend that Scott Pilgrim vs. the World and 50/50 also have served as breakthrough films for her (as her work across these three films have made her one of my favorite young actresses). In Scott Pilgrim vs. the World, directed by Edgar Wright, she has a small supporting role as Pilgrim’s sister. While infrequent, she is funny in her scenes (showing that she has a knack for comedy). 50/50 sees her co-starring opposite Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Seth Rogen in director Jonathan Levine’s cancer comedy. Kendrick, much like with Up in the Air, turns in a wonderful performance, playing both dramatic and comedic beats well. These three films (alright, maybe not Scott Pilgrim) have made her one of the most in-demand talents right now.


Summer Film(s):

In May, Kendrick stars in 2012’s celebrity spectacular (cramming as many famous people into one movie as possible – something that generally never turns out well, unless it is called A Bridge Too Far) What to Expect When You’re Expecting. Directed by Kirk Jones and also starring Elizabeth Banks, Brooklyn Decker, Cameron Diaz, Jennifer Lopez, Dennis Quaid (who stopped caring sometime around 2005, and blatantly just shows up for paychecks now), Chace Crawford, Rodrigo Santoro (and many others), the film is about multiple interweaving stories revolving around being pregnant. Kendrick plays one such pregnant person, after meeting Crawford, getting down and then oops/surprise. While in all likeliness, this will neither be good, nor will win any acclaim for Kendrick (if anyone is walking away from this in a positive light it is Chris Rock or Banks), it still is the biggest project Kendrick has been a part of and should continue to build her career momentum (as based on what comes out and what makes money, most cinemagoers do not care if movies are good or not). Trailer: Here.

Upcoming:

Kendrick has a whole slew of project upcoming. She has five slated for release in 2012. First the new animated film from the same studio (and style) as Coraline and Corpse Bride. ParaNorman, directed by Chris Butler and Sam Fell and starring Kodi Smit-McPhee, is the story of a misunderstood boy who can speak to the dead. When the dead begin to rise, he just might be the only one who can save his town (I just wonder why this is coming out in August and not October when it is clearly a Halloween movie). Kendrick has a supporting voice role. Next, she co-stars in the David Ayer cop drama (he seems to only make cop dramas) End of Watch with Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Pena. Then, she stars in the Jason Moore musical Pitch Perfect (finally getting to show off her Broadway singing voice in a film that more than ten people will see – yes that was a joke directed at Camp). And then, she stars in the religious apocalypse comedy Rapturepalooza, directed by Paul Middleditch. Finally in 2012, she has a supporting role in Robert Redford’s new thriller The Company You Keep starring Shia LaBeouf and Redford, about a former activist who goes on the run after a journalist discovers his identity. In 2013, she co-stars in the Dylan Kidd comedy Get a Job with Alison Brie and Bryan Cranston. While none of these projects immediately scream ‘I’m gonna be great!’, they all have promise, and Kendrick should find herself among the elite actresses of her generation (assuming things work out).


Career Highlights:

1)      Rocket Science (2007) – supporting (DVD)
2)      Up in the Air (2009)* – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming)
3)      Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010)* – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD)
4)      50/50 (2011)* – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming)
*Editor’s picks


What She’s Been In:

Aubrey Plaza, 27, got her start taking on multiple internships, including being an NBC page (like Kenneth – she actually plays a page in a season one episode of 30 Rock). She is also a member of the improv and sketch comedy group the Upright Citizens Brigade Theater (other notable members include: Aziz Ansari, Patton Oswalt, Jake Johnson, and Paul Scheer). Her first role came as a series regular on Mayne Street, a web comedy series based around ESPN personality Kenny Mayne. She has also appeared on the web series Troopers and TV series Portlandia. Film wise, she has been in three small indie films: Someday This Pain Will Be Useful to You, The End of Love and Damsels in Distress (which by far the best of the three). But, outside of her breakthrough roles, she is probably best known as the snarky Julie Powers in the cult (classic) film Scott Pilgrim vs. the World.

Breakthrough:

Plaza’s breakthrough came in 2009’s Funny People, the Judd Apatow film starring Adam Sandler and Seth Rogen about a famous comedian who is diagnosed with a life threatening disease, which leads him to reevaluate his life. She plays an up and coming stand-up comedian and the love interest to Rogen’s character. However, an even bigger breakthrough came when she was cast as a series regular on Parks and Recreation. She plays April Ludgate, a city employ void of all ambition and drive. After struggling through its first season, it has become one of the better TV comedies (especially season two, which is phenomenal).


Summer Film(s):

In June, Plaza takes on her first starring role in the indie summer comedy/adventure Safety Not Guaranteed. Co-starring Jake Johnson and Mark Duplass, and directed by Colin Trevorrow, the film is about a guy, Kenneth, who places an ad in the classified section seeking a companion for time travel. Intrigued, three magazine employees head out to try and interview Kenneth. Plaza plays one of the magazine employees who then gets pulled in by Kenneth and begins to question whether or not he is for real. It looks to be a potentially wonderful comedy, and good counter programming to the blockbusters. Trailer: Here.

Upcoming:

Plaza has two projects upcoming, in addition to the continuation of Parks and Recreation. First, she has a supporting role in Roman Coppola’s new comedy about a graphic designer whose life goes downhill after his girlfriend breaks up with him. Entitled A Glimpse Inside the Mind of Charles Swan III, it stars Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Charlie Sheen and Bill Murray. If CQ is any indication, it should be an interesting film. And second, she has a supporting role in the comedy The To-Do List. Directed by Maggie Carey and starring Rachel Bilson and Scott Porter (and a bunch of great comedians), it is about a high school grad who feels pressure to be more sexually experience before going to college. The first is tentatively scheduled for a 2012 release, the other 2013.


Career Highlights:

1)      Funny People (2009)* – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming)
2)      Scott Pilgrim vs. the World (2010)* – supporting (Blu-ray, DVD)
3)      Parks and Recreation (2009-present)* – lead (DVD, Streaming)
*Editor’s picks