Review:
Rush
is a fantastic sports rivalry drama that is both thrilling and emotionally
engaging. The film is about two highly focused Formula 1 drivers James Hunt and
Niki Lauda (the two best drivers in the world at the time) and their intense
and competitive 1976 season – each man fiercely contending to be World
Champion. Their rivalry was born of hatred, but grew into something more – not just
the motivation to be better, to beat the other, but admiration, respect, and
friendship.
Rush works on multiple narrative
levels. It is a great sports drama, probably the best in years if not ever (on
a side note, here are a few sports films I love: The Pride of the Yankees,
Hoop Dreams, Million Dollar Baby, Cinderella Man, and Goon).
The rivalry between Hunt and Lauda hits all the right dramatic notes. What is
brilliant about the film is that director Ron Howard does such a good job
digging into each character that the audience cares deeply about each man and
does not know who to fully root for – the viewer constantly finds himself
switching sides throughout the film, which is a very compelling experience. The
film also greatly benefits from the majesty of the big theater screen and
speakers. The visuals and sounds of the Formula 1 race cars is onto itself
exciting, to which Howard also adds the drama and thrilling tension of the
narrative. For most, especially in America, this is probably an unfamiliar story
and thus going in the ending is not a known entity, creating an engrossing
narrative just from the perspective of wanting to see who comes out on top. As
a sports film, everything works: the rivalry, the exhilarating visuals and sounds,
and the larger than life heroes.
And yet, as good as the film is
as a sports drama, it is maybe even better as a character piece. Ron Howard
does a wonderful job with Hunt and Lauda. The audience is given enough
character moments for both men to really get to know them and find themselves
drawn in by their struggle and emotional journey. The audience has a strong connection
to each man. Plus, Howard elicits absolutely phenomenal performances from his lead
actors (probably the best of each actor’s careers to date). The juxtaposition
of each man’s approach makes them seemingly perfect rivals: Hunt’s charisma and
life-on-the-edge persona versus Lauda’s socially awkward but brilliant
technician persona. Howard does great work showcasing each man’s perspective
and making a compelling argument for each approach. The audience finds
themselves relating to each man, which is a grand achievement in itself.
Howard also creates a very
intimate feel throughout the film, which aids in the character development.
Visually, Howard’s camera seems to always find itself right in the mix,
invading the personal space of the characters placing the audience often in
their perspective. The audience feels the full impact of each emotional high
and low the character experiences, because they are right in there with them. The
race scenes feel more breathtaking, because the audience is often right in the
driver seat as well. Howard’s camera creates an overall heightened dramatic
tension that really plays well for the audience, pulling them into the
narrative even more.
From a pacing standpoint, Howard
also does a good job. His narrative is structured to continually switch
perspectives between Hunt and Lauda, with much of the story told through
voice-over narration. The film never feels slow because Howard is able to
switch back and forth from his two leads always telling the overall story from
the best perspective (from a narrative sense).
Really, if there is anything to
nitpick about Rush it is that the film is basically at its core just a by-the-numbers
sports drama. The rivalry story is a tried-and-true narrative device that has
been done over and over in popular media. Rush does not quite transcend its
place as an entertaining Hollywood film. That said, however, it is a very
entertaining experience and one of the best films of 2013 so far.
Technical,
aesthetic & acting achievements: Ron Howard is a staple of Hollywood
filmmaking. His films generally have the gloss and feel of grand, but safe,
dramas (in which Howard does often garner strong performances) or A-list star
driven comedies (that are never very good). His work, while hit or miss in
terms of quality, has never been exciting from an aesthetic perspective.
However, with Rush, Howard makes both his best narrative film and his most
artistic. The film has a very ambitious and aesthetically interesting visual
style that works extremely well with the narrative drama and characters. After
a couple of his poorer directorial efforts, Howard’s filmmaking seems to have
found new life (Rush is my favorite of Howard’s over twenty films, I also like Willow, Parenthood, A Beautiful Mind,
Cinderella Man, and Frost/Nixon –
Apollo 13 is
probably Howard’s other most critically acclaimed, I am just not as big a fan).
Hans Zimmer’s score works well
to reinforce the thrilling and dramatic moments of the film, but is greatly
overshadowed both by the solid soundtrack of period songs and the wonderful
sound design (comprised of revving engines and squealing tires). Anthony
Dod Mantle’s photography is second to none so far in 2013. It is brilliant
work. The stylized look of the races, often combining what looks like actual
footage with what Howard and Dod Mantle shot, works exceptionally in its
ability to create a realistic experience for the audience. There are many
stunning photographic moments in the film, culminating in the sheer
magnificence of the final race scene in the rainy shadow of Mt. Fuji. Mark Digby’s production design
is also top notch, as his work completely transports the audience into the
1970s both visually and culturally. The overall look and feel of the race
scenes is a great achievement for all involved in the film.
The cast is very good throughout.
Christian McKay (doing is
typically wonderful, scene-stealing character work), Natalie Dormer, and Pierfrancesco Favino are all
very good in small supporting roles. Olivia Wilde does not have too many
dramatic opportunities, as she is basically there to look glamorous. She not
only captures the look, but she also does good work in the few dramatic scenes
she is given. Alexandra Maria
Lara has a fuller supporting role than Wilde, and she takes full advantage.
Her strong work allows the audience to see something more in Lauda, which then
enables them to switch sides and root for him, despite the immutable charisma
of Hunt. However, the film is really all about two characters and two performances.
Daniel Bruhl is incredible as
Lauda. It is a full on character performance, as Bruhl is completely lost in
the role. What works very well is that while Lauda is not particularly likable,
his confidence in himself and his talent in its own way gives him a kind of
charisma that the audience can latch onto, and Bruhl does not miss any opportunity
to pull them in. Chris Hemsworth
is just having a blast with Hunt. The role plays off of Hemsworth’s natural
talents as an actor: being handsome and charismatic, but he brings a deeper
emotional turmoil to the role that is very interesting. As confident and care
free as Hunt may appear to be, he also has his demons. Both characters feel
like fully developed, real people and that is due to Bruhl and Hemsworth.
Summary
& score: Rush may be the greatest sports film ever made, as it
captures the imagination and the heart of the audience – just like the power of
sport. 8/10
No comments:
Post a Comment