Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Joan Fontaine & Teresa Wright – Cinema Legends – June 2015

Joan Fontaine and Teresa Wright are both actresses who made their best films in the 1940s. They both won Oscars. And, they both starred in great films directed by Alfred Hitchcock. Are they Cinema Legends, as the header of this post might suggest? Probably not to the same degree as a few of their contemporaries, but they are two of my favorites from the time period, and I wanted to share a bit about them and their films.

Joan Fontaine

Joan Fontaine and her sister Olivia de Havilland, who she was bitter rivals with throughout her life, were born in Japan, but her family moved to California when the girls were still young. Fontaine started her career in Hollywood in 1935 when she signed a contract with RKO Pictures, shortly after debuting in the West Coast stage production of Call It a Day. RKO thought of her as a rising star, but she struggled to really make an impact in the 1930s, mostly featuring in supporting roles (most notably as Peggy Day in The Women and Emmy in Gunga Din).


Everything changed for her, however, when she was seated next to producer David O. Selznick at a dinner party. O. Selznick was in the process of developing Daphne du Maurier’s novel Rebecca as Alfred Hitchcock’s American debut. They started discussing the film adaptation and O. Selznick suggested that Fontaine audition. She did, along with hundreds of other actresses. Laurence Olivier had been cast as Mr. de Winter and he hoped and lobbied for his wife Vivien Leigh to take the lead role; but, neither Hitchcock nor O. Selznick thought she was right for the part. After six months of auditioning and film tests, Fontaine finally emerged with the role. The film, a masterpiece, played to critical and commercial acclaim, winning the 1941 Best Picture Academy Award (it is the only Hitchcock film to win Best Picture). Fontaine’s performance as Mrs. de Winter was praised as well, garnering her a Best Actress nomination (though she did not win).


She would not have to wait long for another chance, however, as she next appeared opposite Cary Grant (with whom she has great chemistry) in the Hitchcock thriller Suspicion, this time winning the Best Actress Oscar (cementing her rivalry with her sister who was very jealous that Joan had won an Oscar first). Her win is also the only Oscar-winning performance in a Hitchcock film.


Fontaine excelled during the rest of the 1940s in romantic melodramas. Chief among them are The Constant Nymph, Jane Eyre, and Letter from and Unknown Woman. The Constant Nymph is Joan’s favorite among her own films and she received her third Oscar nomination for her work on the film, but for a long time it is was very hard to find a copy of it – thus, I have never seen it (although, it is now on Amazon, so I hope to remedy my having not seen it soon).


In Jane Eyre, she takes the title role opposite Orson Welles, who pretty much ran the production even though the film is directed by Robert Stevenson (who would later direct many films for Disney including Mary Poppins). The film is one of the best cinematic adaptations of the gothic novel and both Fontaine and Welles are very good. In Letter from an Unknown Woman, Fontaine plays a woman who is in love with a man who never quite realizes what he has with her, always chasing something else. It is directed by the great Max Ophuls and is considered to be among the best films ever made (number 154 on Sight & Sound’s 2012 Critics’ Top 250 Films list and number 71 on my list of the Top 100 Films of the 20th Century).


Fontaine’s career waned a bit in the 1950s, as she started to take on more television and stage roles. She continued to act until 1994.


Teresa Wright

Teresa Wright was born in Harlem, New York. She started her acting career in 1939 when she was discovered by Samuel Goldwyn on the stage in Life with Father. Goldwyn offered her a five-year contract, but she had some demands (here is an excerpt from her first Hollywood contract: “The aforementioned Teresa Wright shall not be required to pose for photographs in a bathing suit unless she is in the water. Neither may she be photographed running on the beach with her hair flying in the wind. Nor may she pose in any of the following situations: In shorts, playing with a cocker spaniel; digging in a garden; whipping up a meal; attired in firecrackers and holding skyrockets for the Fourth of July; looking insinuatingly at a turkey for Thanksgiving; wearing a bunny cap with long ears for Easter; twinkling on prop snow in a skiing outfit while a fan blows her scarf; assuming an athletic stance while pretending to hit something with a bow and arrow.”). She wanted to assert her seriousness as an actress from the jump.


In 1941, she won her first role opposite Bette Davis in the adaptation of Lillian Hellman’s The Little Foxes. She immediately won over critics and Hollywood, garnering a Best Supporting Actress Oscar nomination for her work. The film was directed by William Wyler, the first of a many fruitful collaborations between the actress and director.


In 1942, she starred in two films, and received two more Academy Award nominations (I wonder if anyone else has ever received Oscar nominations for all three of their first three film appearances? Doubtful). She won the Oscar for Best Supporting Actress for Mrs. Miniver, a fantastic propaganda drama directed by Wyler. Her performance is touted as being a somewhat significant factor in winning over average Americans approval for entering the war in Europe to support Britain against the Nazis (which was unwelcome in the wake of the very unpopular WWI). She also received a Best Actress nomination for her role in Pride of the Yankees opposite Gary Cooper. It is a biopic of Yankee Legend Lou Gehrig. Her performance in the final scenes is heartbreaking (and a chief reason many cry at the end of the film). She also holds a special place with the New York Yankees organization, her name being remembered among the greats when she passed in 2005.


Next, in 1943, Teresa won the lead role in Alfred Hitchcock’s Shadow of a Doubt (though, initially Hitchcock wanted Joan Fontaine for the role, but her schedule was incompatible) opposite Joseph Cotten. Wright is brilliant in the film, playing an innocent young girl who becomes suspicious that her beloved uncle is a serial murderer. Shadow of a Doubt is one of Hitchcock’s best and it is considered to be his first truly American film, taking place is small town America. Hitchcock thought Wright was one of the best and most intelligent actresses her worked with, bringing many qualities to her character not often found in his heroines.


 Wright made two films about war veterans returning from WWII. The first, again with Wyler, was The Best Years of Our Lives, which one Best Picture in 1947. It is a brave, profound and important drama. The other was 1950’s The Men, directed by Fred Zinnemann and it starred Marlon Brando (in his film debut). She also starred opposite Robert Mitchum in the Raoul Walsh directed western Pursued in 1947. The film is a much darker version of the West than audiences were typically used to in the genre.



Throughout her career Wright had been widely acclaimed by film critics; however, she also felt unfairly treated by the studio system. So, in 1948, she rebelled against that system, and fell out with the man who discovered her, losing her contract with Goldwyn. Years later, Wright regretted her choice saying, “I was going to be Joan of Arc, and all I proved was that I was an actress who would work for less money.” She worked throughout the 1950s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s (her final appearance is in Francis Ford Coppola’s The Rainmaker), but her career never saw the same heights as it had in the 1940s. 


Thursday, June 18, 2015

Underrated and Under Seen (So Far) in 2015 – Movies Spotlight – June 2015

A lot of great films have come out in 2015 so far. Blockbusters like Avengers: Age of Ultron, Mad Max: FuryRoad and Pixar’s Inside Out, as well as a bunch of really good indie films like Ex Machina, Clouds of Sils Maria, It Follows, Love & Mercy, Me and Earl and the Dying Girl, Slow West, What We Do in the Shadows, Far from the Madding Crowd, Dope, While We’re Young, and ‘71. It is easy to say that all these independent films are under seen (because they are), but that is a function of availability and the economics of film distribution. One might also say that Mad Max: Fury Road is under seen relative to other big blockbusters like Jurassic World and Furious 7, both of which have greatly out-performed Mad Max at the box office but are not on the same level of critical praise (or even close – personally, I think Furious 7 is 2015’s most overrated film so far). Thus, I am going to look at two Hollywood films that had all the right elements to be hits but failed commercially and critically; when really, they are both very good films.


Film: Blackhat
Director: Michael Mann
Stars: Chris Hemsworth, Wei Tang, Viola Davis, Leehom Wang, Ritchie Coster, John Ortiz, and Yorick van Wageningen
Plot Summary: When a hacker’s malware triggers the meltdown of a Chinese power plant, the Chinese and American governments turn to their own computer experts to find and stop this new hacker threat.
Why You Should Give It a Chance: Writer-director Michael Mann makes dynamic dramas and sprawling crime epics. His films feature beautiful aesthetics and a gripping realism. For most of his career, his films were greeted with critical acclaim and strong box office numbers (films like Thief, The Last of the Mohicans, Heat, The Insider, and Collateral). His recent efforts, however, seem to have failed to reach their audiences (although, Miami Vice, Public Enemies and now Blackhat are all very good crime drama/thrillers that I think time and perspective will reinstate as canonized quality films). Blackhat benefits from good leading performances from Chris Hemsworth and Wei Tang, as well as Mann, cinematographer Stuart Dryburgh and production designer Guy Hendrix Dyas’s wonderful and vital aesthetics. Blachhat is a topically relevant crime thriller, playing on the scary idea of the future (or present) of cyber terrorism, but more than that it is a captivating film, not just in terms of its use of tension, but in its ability to immerse its viewer in its world and vision.
Trailer: Here
Available on: Blu-ray and Video On-Demand


Director: Brad Bird
Stars: Britt Robertson, George Clooney, Raffey Cassidy, and Hugh Laurie
Plot Summary: With ambitions to make tomorrow better than today, a bright teen with scientific talent and curiosity (Casey) teams up with a jaded former wunderkind inventor (Frank) to make those ambitions a reality by finding ‘Tomorrowland’.
Why You Should Give It a Chance: Let me start with the cast. Britt Robertson and Raffey Cassidy are fantastic in the film, delivering great and strong performances (continuing 2015’s seeming attempt to promote feminism in cinema, Mad Max: Fury Road’s Imperator Furiosa as the poster-woman). George Clooney is good as well. Writer-director Brad Bird’s films generally provide a good mix of comedy, resonating drama and brilliant action (his other work includes: The Iron Giant, The Incredibles, Ratatouille, and Mission: Impossible – Ghost Protocol). Tomorrowland is no different; however, what I think sets it apart and makes it something special and worthwhile is its cinematic/dramatic aspiration. Not just to enthrall, excite and entertain, it does those things too, but to inspire its viewers to once again dream. Much like last year’s Interstellar, Tomorrowland is a call to its viewers to once again look ahead with wonder and hope and not just settle for the doom and gloom malaise that seems to have overcome us as a people. We do not like to think about the future, because now the future does not seem as bright as today. But our dreams, imagination, ingenuity, and work effort can change that. This is what is at the heart of Tomorrowland.
Trailer: Here
Available on: Blu-ray and Video On-Demand

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Sequels, Reboots and Remakes – Movies Spotlight – June 2015

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Sequel/Reboot/Remake

We all know that Hollywood is overrun with sequels, reboots and remakes. Just look at the films we are most excited to see this year: Avengers: Age of Ultron (sequel), Mad Max: Fury Road (sequel/reboot), Jurassic World (sequel/reboot), Terminator: Genisys (sequel/reboot), Ant-Man (sequel of sorts), Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation (sequel) Fantastic Four (reboot), Spectre (James Bond sequel), The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 2 (sequel), Star Wars: Episode VII – The Force Awakens (sequel). Why all the sequels and reboots? Plainly, if a Hollywood studio is going to spend a bunch of money on a film, they would like it to be as secure a bet as possible, so why not bet on established properties. Original blockbusters are often based on successful books, comics, video games, television series, or something that came prior. There are very few truly original blockbusters. And when Hollywood does give us a good one, like Disney’s Tomorrowland, which came out in May to mixed reviews and mild box office returns (not reaching its audience – I genuinely think it is great film), no one goes to see it. Or worse, Jupiter Ascending, an original blockbuster from the Wachowskis that bombed in every way. This only increases the likeliness of Hollywood to stay away from original ideas, as there is much more risk.


So, we are likely stuck in a world of constant sequels and rehashes of the same established characters, stories and properties.


At first, I was annoyed by the very idea of someone making a new film based on an old film or character that I loved. A good example is Steve Martin’s The Pink Panther. Steve Martin is a very funny comedian and a good actor, but why would he ever want to attempt Inspector Clouseau – a losing proposition at best? A character made famous in the 1960s by Peter Sellers (probably film’s greatest comedic actor to this day). Martin could never approach what Sellers brought to the character, all this new film could do is soil the reputation of the character (is what I initially thought).


This is an overreaction. At worst, the new Pink Panther films scar younger viewers, preventing them from seeing the Peter Sellers’ films (but let us be honest, they were not going to watch them anyway). At best, the new viewers would love the character of Inspector Clouseau and seek him out in other films, finding their way to Sellers’ genius. Also, do not forget that the Clouseau character has been played by other actors before Martin took over in 2006 (Alan Arkin in the 60s and Roger Moore in the 80s, as well as Roberti Benigni, in spirit, in 1993’s Son of the Pink Panther). Martin was in no way tarnishing a character that was not already grinded up and spit out in many other subpar forms.


I came to understand that remaking or reboot a beloved character/series/film really has no effect on the original (or the version I love most). If I do not like the new vision for the character then I still have the original, and if the actors and filmmakers bring something new or different to the story/character then all the better. I take more of a wait and see approach now than one that finds me immediately upset before seeing how the new film even turns out (and if it does turn out to be terrible, I do not have to see it or even acknowledge its existence – like the Star Wars Prequels or Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, I just live my life as if they do not exist). I will always have the version I love.


Now on to sequels. So many sequels. They crowd our summers and holiday seasons. Yet, many of them are films I love. I love The Lord of the Rings Trilogy. I love the Harry Potter film series. I love Sam Raimi’s Spider-Man 2. I love Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight Trilogy. I love what the Marvel Cinematic Universe has become during Phase II (especially Joss Whedon’s brilliant Avengers films) and cannot wait for Phase III. Of course I love these big adventure/action/fantasy films. I grew up on Star Wars, Indiana Jones and Ghostbusters. When these big films are done well, they capture all that film can be.


So why is there such a stigma? Well, I think it is twofold. First, and chiefly, for each sequel, reboot or remake there is money not going to an original idea film, blockbuster or otherwise, which has led many of our great auteurs today to work solely in indie film (for better or worse). Secondly, many of these tent pole blockbuster sequels, reboot and remakes are just not good. For every great film like The Dark Knight, there many more films like Catwoman or Batman and Robin. Or forgetting the downright terrible, most of these blockbusters are just the same old thing, nothing special and bland. Even Jurassic World, which just opened to the biggest box office weekend ever, is painfully banal and uninteresting. It is entertainment for the moment but not good enough to be lasting (like Jurassic Park).


We are just tired of the endless parade of these boring action films that try to thrill us by being massive, but offer little in the important areas of character and emotional resonance. They may grab us in the moment, but they fail to stay with us, inspire us or capture our imaginations.


How does this change? The answer is easy. If we do not give our money to these films, Hollywood will stop making them; but as Jurassic World proves, audiences are just fine with thrills over substance. Thus, I say take a similar approach to blockbuster sequels as you do with reboots and remakes. Revel in the films that are great and ignore and move past the ones that are marginal or bad.


Because honestly, who is not passionately eager to see the new James Bond film, the new Star Wars, the next Marvel Cinematic Universe film (Captain America: Civil War), Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (Warner Bros.’s new Harry Potter prequel series), Disney’s live-action version of Beauty and the Beast, Pixar’s Finding Dory, the conclusion of The Hunger Games series, or the third iteration of Spider-Man (now a part of the MCU)? I know I cannot wait to see all of these.


Friday, May 8, 2015

TV Spotlight – The 25 Best Series on Television – May 2015

It is that time of the year again when we find out what will be on TV in the Fall/Spring/Summer 2015-2016 and what will not be. It is a good time to discuss the best series on television (or, what is on HBO, AMC, FX, and Netflix).

Let us start with HBO, which boasts TV’s best lineup of dramas and comedies. Also on HBO are television’s best two news programs Last Week Tonight with John Oliver and Vice (forget your local and national new coverage, it is pointless and severely lacking by comparison).


Game of Thrones is the most popular series in the world and it is maybe television’s only true must-see series (particularly for fantasy/adventure genre fans). Its popularity has given HBO the ability to become autonomous with their HBO Now service.


Girls is the brilliantly funny and resonant dramedy from Lena Dunham. The series began as sort of a Sex and the City for a new generation, but I think it has become so much more, really getting at the meat of these characters and what it is like the grow up and become an adult in a much more substantial way. It is also good fun to watch.


Veep is Armando Iannucci’s hilarious political comedy (that feels very much like an extension of his film In the Loop). Sadly, he is leaving the series at the end of Season 4 (its current season), but the great mix of characters/actors and its sharp wit make it one of TV’s best comedies.


True Detective is an anthology series, with new characters, location and a case each season. Season 1 was incredible; Season 2 looks to be primed to be just as good. Nic Pizzolatto has assembled a wonderful cast for Season 2 (but it is still hard to imagine it eclipsing Season 1, which was probably the best thing on television in 2014).


Silicon Valley is a satire from Mike Judge that seems to perfectly capture the culture of the high-tech landscape in Silicon Valley, while remaining biting and hysterical. I am really interested to see where this show with go in the future, as things so far have moved relatively slowly (in terms of pushing the plot forward in a major way).


The Leftovers is fantastic on a character level, as it looks into the lives of the people left behind in a small suburban community after what could be called the Rapture. Opinions are rather mixed, probably due to the religious overtones associated with the series, but personally I think it is an excellent series.


Togetherness debuted this year, telling the story of a couple whose marriage seems to be falling apart. There series is funny and dramatically engaging, but really it is Season 1’s finally that really makes this a must. It is electric.

Moving on to Netflix…


House of Cards is Netflix’s biggest series, but with each season it seems to be losing what made it so good – its characters. At the end of Season 3, we are left with a bunch of unlikable people that we do not really even want to root for and thus do not care about. Watching House of Cards has become more about what will happen next in the plot and not because we are interested in where the characters will be taken next (on a character level). That is too bad, but maybe everything will turn around in Season 4. Otherwise, this might fall out of the top 25.


Orange Is the New Black is probably the best series on Netflix now. It is different from anything else in the medium. The only question I have is how do the show’s writers keep it fresh when the characters are so confined?


BoJack Horseman is a weird and wonderful animated comedy about a washed up sitcom actor who also happens to be a horse. It is a bizarre series, but infectiously funny.


Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt is the new series from Tina Fey and Robert Carlock. In many ways it feels a lot like 30 Rock in tone and comedy style, though I would argue that it is superior. It too is infectious and addictive.


Daredevil is the first of four planned collaborations between Marvel and Netflix. It is the best superhero series on television (and better than most of the Marvel films as well). As the beginning of watch will eventually become the Defenders, I cannot wait to see how AKA Jessica Jones, Luke Cage and Iron Fist turn out (after the brilliance of Season 1 of Daredevil).

Moving on to Yahoo Screen…


Community was cancelled by NBC only to find a new home on Yahoo Screen. The result is a show that is mostly the same as it was before – very funny, odd and among the greatest things the sitcom-like format has to offer. Will we get a Season 7 or just go straight to the movie?

Moving on to AMC…

With Mad Men ending this year and Breaking Bad ending last year, AMC needs to develop some new great show to take their place (a tall order, given that during their runs both were in the top five of almost every critic’s list).


Better Call Saul is an easy answer, being the prequel to Breaking Bad centering on the unscrupulous lawyer Saul Goodman (or as he is known on this series Jimmy McGill). Thanks to the tireless work of Bob Odenkirk, Vince Gilligan and Peter Gould. This series is excellent, living up to the seemingly high expectations.


The Walking Dead is AMC’s other heavy hitter, and maybe their most addictive series (I usually wait until it is on Netflix because every episode is a cliffhanger). It is amazing that this show has not become tired and boring given that every episode or storyline seems to go the same way (things kick off and then zombies show up to add extra tension). It has its slow moments, but it also has it fantastic, edge-of-your-seats moments.

Moving on to Cinemax…


The Knick is a medical drama that is also a period piece, and so far that formula is working very well, especially on premium cable, giving it an edge over what similar networks shows can even attempt.

Moving on to Comedy Central…

Inside Amy Schumer is hilarious and has made itself mandatory pop-culture viewing (but I do not really think of it as a series, thus it is disqualified from this list); however…


Broad City is also mandatory pop-culture viewing. It is works as a great companion series to Girls, as it too is about young women making a go of it in New York City. It is not nearly as dramatic as Girl, but probably stranger and often funnier. I recommend watching both.

Moving on to FX…

FX is also losing many of its standout dramas with Sons of Anarchy and Justified (a personal favorite) ending.


Fargo is their big dramatic series now, also working as a black comedy. It was promoted as an anthology series, but I expect to see some of Season 1’s characters show up in Season 2.


Archer is an animated spy series comedy that just builds on itself to such an extent that it feels like the whole show has become a series of inside jokes, which is fantastic for its fans that have been with it since the beginning. The voice-acting and jokes are tops (and often insane).


Louie is a comedy series from Louis C.K. that often feels like a drama and seems to resonate on a much deeper level than one would ever expect. Yes it is funny, but more so it is thoughtful and shows us life as it is (which is something that seems to be strangely missing from TV dramas).

Moving on to Masterpiece Theatre…


Sherlock is returning in 2015 with a Christmas Special, and Season 4 in 2016. I cannot wait.


Downton Abbey, everyone’s favorite period soap opera, is ending with Season 6, which will give Julian Fellows the ability to do almost anything with his characters, which should make for great television.


Wolf Hall tells the same story as The Tudors. You could just watch that, but Wolf Hall tells it so well and has such a great cast that it is well worth visiting the exploits of King Henry VIII yet again.

Moving on to NBC…


Hannibal is the only network series on this list. It is also one of the five best series in any format. It is incredibly stylish, well-acted and features wonderful writing and directing. I think it is the best iteration of the characters so far.

And finally, moving on to the Sundance Channel…


Rectify is a slow burn character. It is the opposite of most TV series. It asks you to invest in its characters as it slowly builds the tension without giving you much action or twists or soap operay moments (House of Cards should take notes, as it has delved into full on soap opera theatrics).


There you have it. The 25 TV Series that I think are the best currently on TV for the 2015-2016 season.

Thursday, April 9, 2015

Auteurs (The Great Directors of Cinema History): Part 3 – Movies Spotlight – April 2015

List is in alphabetical order.


Part III – The Modern Director (A.K.A. Blockbusters or Small Indies)


Style/system: American; works in American independent film; flawed characters, stylized moving camera, memorable use of music, an overall aesthetic flare
Active: 1988-Present
Key films to see: Boogie Nights, Magnolia, There Will Be Blood, and The Master


Style/system: American; works in American independent film; highly stylized aesthetics (down to the smallest detail), wonderful and ambitious camera moves, stylized blocking, youths with potential and adults not reaching their potential, memorable use of music
Active: 1994-Presnet


Jacques Audiard
Style/system: French; works in France; an aesthetic flare, but also an actor’s director, flawed characters looking for redemption, gritty settings, dramatically specific/effective use of violence
Active: 1994-Present


Kathryn Bigelow
Style/system: American; works in Hollywood; a terrific use of dramatic tension and suspense, gritty action, strong performances despite films being plot driven
Active: 1978-Present
Key films to see: Point Break, The Hurt Locker and Zero Dark Thirty


Style/system: English; works in England, American independent film and Hollywood; frenetic/up-beat editing, digital photography pioneer; leaves room for comedy in his dramas
Active: 1987-Present
Key films to see: Shallow Grave, Trainspotting, 28 Days Later…, Sunshine, and Slumdog Millionaire


James Cameron
Style/system: American; works in Hollywood; big action movies and grand epics, pushing technology forward (basically, singlehandedly resurrected 3D, for better or worse), an explorer at heart (especially in documentary work)
Active: 1978-Present
Key films to see: The Terminator, Aliens, Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Titanic, and Avatar


Coen Brothers (Joel and Ethan)
Style/system: American; work in American independent film; highly stylized dialog and aesthetics, masters of composition and camera movement, as well as narrative storytelling that deviates from the norm (regardless of genre), oddball characters, leaders of America’s resurgence of independent cinema in the 1980s/1990s
Active: 1984-Present


Sofia Coppola
Style/system: American; works in American independent cinema; highly stylized aesthetics, wandering/free form narratives that feel far more about character than plot, great use of music
Active: 1996-Present
Key films to see: The Virgin Suicides, Lost in Translation and Somewhere


Style/system: Mexican; works in Mexico, England and Hollywood; brilliant long-take tracking shots, naturalistic feel to his work despite often making sci-fi, fantasy and actions films
Active: 1983-Present


Style/system: American; works in Hollywood; prolific music video director, a master of the mystery thriller, bleached out color schemes often on the cool side of the palate, brilliant, specific and expertly used camera moves
Active: 1985-Presnet
Key films to see: Se7en, Fight Club, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, The Social Network, and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo


Miyazaki Hayao
Style/system: Japanese; works in Japan; the master of Japanese animation, highly influential for today’s leading animation storytellers, an expert in narrative storytelling and use of drama/comedy
Active: 1972-Present
Key films to see: Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind, My Neighbor Totoro, Princess Mononoke, Spirited Away, and Howl’s Moving Castle


Todd Haynes
Style/system: American; works in American independent film; subversive narrative structure, provocative storytelling, complex eroticism, wonderful performances
Active: 1978-Present
Key films to see: Superstar: The Karen Carpenter Story, Velvet Goldmine, Far from Heaven, and Mildred Pierce (HBO Miniseries)


Jean-Pierre Jeunet
Style/system: French; works in France; surreal narratives, exaggerated color palates, an aesthetic flare, odd characters and locations yet also charming
Active: 1978-Present
Key films to see: Delicatessen, The City of Lost Children, Amelie, A Very Long Engagement, and Micmacs


Spike Jonze
Style/system: American; works in Hollywood; a prolific music video director, narratives that push the boundaries – feeling as they might exist in our world but also strange and foreign, things are always just a bit off, elicits phenomenal performances
Active: 1991-Present
Key films to see: Being John Malkovich, Adaptation. and Her


Krzysztof Kieslowski
Style/system: Polish; worked in Poland and France; a magnificent use of color and sound (music), deeply emotional narratives and performances, striking aesthetic, powerfully moving storytelling
Active: 1966-1994
Key films to see: A Short Film About Love, A Short Film About Killing, The Double Life of Veronique, Three Colors: Blue, and Three Colors: Red


Ang Lee
Style/system: Taiwanese; works in American independent film, Hollywood, England, and China; conflict between tradition and modernity, repressed emotions, powerful dramatic storytelling, superb performances
Active: 1982-Present
Key films to see: Eat Drink Man Woman, The Ice Storm, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Brokeback Mountain, and Life of Pi


David Lynch
Style/system: American; works in American independent film; bizarre narratives, creepy characters, often surreal, violent, highly stylized aesthetics
Active: 1966-Present
Key films to see: Eraserhead, The Elephant Man, Blue Velvet, The Straight Story, and Mulholland Drive


Michael Mann
Style/system: American; works in Hollywood; a master of the crime drama, violent, stark, authentic, highly stylized aesthetics (often featuring wonderful photography)
Active: 1968-Present
Key films to see: Thief, The Last of the Mohicans, Heat, The Insider, and Collateral


Steve McQueen
Style/system: English; works in England and Hollywood; powerful, emotional dramas, wonderful long-take shots (often employing a static camera), garners sensational performances, a true artist
Active: 1993-Present
Key films to see: Hunger, Shame and 12 Years a Slave


Style/system: English; works in England, American independent cinema and Hollywood; the master of the modern blockbuster/epic, psychological narratives, disjunctive narrative structures, grand action sequences, practical effects (in a world of cgi), a champion of film over digital
Active: 1997-Present
Key films to see: Memento, The Prestige, The Dark Knight, Inception, and Interstellar


Park Chan-wook
Style/system: Korean; works in Korea and American independent film; brutal, precise aesthetics, black humor
Active: 1992-Present
Key films to see: J.S.A.: Joint Security Area, Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance, Oldboy, Sympathy for Lady Vengeance, and Thirst


Quentin Tarantino
Style/system: American; works in American independent film; violent, great dialog, highly stylized and referential aesthetics, a film fan first, a leader of the revitalization of America’s independent cinema, a champion of film over digital
Active: 1983-Present
Key films to see: Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Kill Bill: Vol. 1, Inglourious Basterds, and Django Unchained


Thomas Vinterberg
Style/system: Danish; works in Denmark, England and American independent film; co-founder of Dogme 95 (a movement to simplify film production), champion and pioneer of digital photography, deeply dramatic narratives, character-driven films, an actor’s director
Active: 1990-Present
Key films to see: The Celebration, Submarino and The Hunt


Lars von Trier
Style/system: Danish; works in Denmark, England and American independent film; co-founder of Dogme 95 (a movement to simplify film production), a minimalist, often makes provocative narratives, pushes social boundaries, highly stylized aesthetics
Active: 1967-Present
Key films to see: Europa, Breaking the Waves, Dancer in the Dark, Dogville, and Melancholia


Wong Kar Wai
Style/system: Chinese; works in China, France and American independent film; a director’s director, emotionally dramatic narratives, solemn tones, tragic romance, a wondrous use of color, highly stylized aesthetics
Active: 1988-Present
Key films to see: Days of Being Wild, Chungking Express, Fallen Angels, In the Mood for Love, and 2046